These notes were compiled by Karen Bennett, a former Volunteer in Mission for the Presbyterian Church and 35-year member of the Sierra Club and Bread for the World. Karen holds an M.A. in French from Middlebury College and attends Jacksonville Presbyterian Church in Bordentown, NJ. She is also active on Mission and Earth Care committees.
At the Presbyterians for Earth Care
Conference, held in Little Rock, AR: from Oct. 16-19, 2013, the theme of "Ethical
Earth Care: Keeping Creation Sacred" was led in Plenary sessions by Larry
Rasmussen, ThD, who focused on “Earth-Honoring Faith.” He reflected on how the sacred
and creation intersect.
Sacred traditions were organized by
the following dichotomies:
- asceticism
vs. consumerism (the simple life offers an alternative to the consuming
spirit of desire)
- sacred
vs. commodified (sacramental ethics views life as a shared commons,
contrasting against a commodity ethics)
- mysticism
vs. alienation (classic mystical experience is that humankind belongs to
the "all". Alienation is resolved by all things communing with
God.
- prophetic/liberative
practices vs. oppression (Justice is at center of Christian life with the
prophet's vision of a redeemed creation. Contrast this with evil and
injustice from a violated creation and mal-distributions of power
- wisdom
vs. folly (all wisdom traditions counter the negative forces in our lives
and in creative order and deal with universal religious and cultural
traditions.
What is sacred? David Gushee
defines it as "something common lifted up and set apart, with elevated
rank" Greta Van Wieren in Restored to Earth believes violating the
sacred is a serious sin and often a crime.
The ecological virtues for restoring us and the earth also include a
list of 5-"R"s:
-Reverence, Respect, Restraint, Redistribution,
Responsibility, and Renewal.
What kind of communities are needed
for ethical earth-care? Dr. Erin
Biviano's research on congregational environmentalism found the following
elements necessary for environmental activism:
- adequate level of scientific literacy (when the
knowledge gap is devoid of science, religious environmentalism has very
little purchase)
- multiple interdependencies (everything belongs and
should have a life- living up or down stream- creation is seamless and
recycles everything)
- social and economic (20% of San Francisco air
pollution is from China)
- ecological
- spiritual (moral and spiritual issues-kinship and
family-the homeless at a church shelter who have names – everything
belongs and should have a life)
- moral heat of social justice (-among the most
identified and influential among religious environmentalists- focused on
poor people and the love of the present, future, near, far, animate and
inanimate neighbor- The human poor and the earth as the new poor, here
social justice expands to become creation justice.
- the discovery of a bigger God (making green
spirituality the broader platform for moral globalization. We must gather 13.8 billion years of
religious environmentalism).
Final reflections, regarded having
the "green blues" or environmental melancholia. How do Christians
cope with irreversible climate change? We
are charged with leading people through grief and loss, trying to keep nature
sacred. We should work for the whole
earth and not focus on single environmental campaigns.
No comments:
Post a Comment